When Japan’s outgoing Prime Minister Fumio Kishida holds a final summit this week with South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol, he will be sending a signal of support not only to the neighboring nation, but his would-be successors as well.
Prodded by U.S. President Joe Biden, the two leaders orchestrated an about-face in ties that had sunk to their lowest level in decades amid acrimonious diplomatic and trade disputes over Japan’s occupation of Korea from 1910 to 1945.
But the strength of their new partnership is set to be tested by Kishida’s imminent departure and the prospect of a shake-up in the White House with November’s presidential election.
“Prime Minister Kishida may have to show that what he did with President Yoon is the right direction and he expects whoever succeeds him to follow the current direction of the Japan-Korea relationship,” said Tetsuo Kotani, a senior fellow at the Japan Institute of International Affairs.
As Kishida’s response to Yoon’s overtures had spurred pushback from Japan’s political right, his successor could face pressure from conservatives to take a harder line, Kotani added.
“We know that in the past, that when Japan and Korea have found their way to rapprochement, political change has sometimes contributed to setback, or set the conditions for setback,” a senior U.S. administration official said.
“So while… our confidence is high in the future of our relationship with Japan and all of our multilateral engagements, Kishida’s step here is really important,” added the official, who sought anonymity in discussing diplomatic matters.
While few major announcements are expected from the summit, officials said they saw Kishida’s final visit to Seoul as crucial to U.S. efforts to present a unified front against challenges from neighboring North Korea and China.
Kishida’s visit is not just a signal of support and thanks to Yoon, but also a message to the Japanese government and prime ministerial candidates that the partnership has to be a lasting part of Tokyo’s foreign policy, the U.S. official added.
Japan’s ruling Liberal Democratic Party will hold elections on Sept 27 to choose Kishida’s successor.
Last year U.S. President Joe Biden invited Yoon and Kishida to Camp David where the three leaders committed to deepen military and economic co-operation.
They also delivered their strongest joint condemnation yet of “dangerous and aggressive behavior” by China in the disputed busy waterway of the South China Sea.
The Camp David initiatives were explicitly designed to prompt long-term partnership so that “no one of us would have an incentive to pull away from that deeper co-operation if political change did happen,” the U.S. official said.
Yoon has said the partnership will remain effective in part because of the diplomatic pacts both sides had adopted.
“There could always be some anxiety about the new prime minister, especially given the personal synergy between the two leaders,” said a senior South Korean government official who sought anonymity to discuss sensitive diplomatic matters.
“But the fundamentals of relations won’t change, and Kishida’s visit will reaffirm the significance of having good relations with Korea and could send a message to the incoming leader, whoever that might be.”
‘Strong request’
Kishida made a “strong request” to see Yoon a final time before he leaves office, the South Korean official said.
The summit is expected to yield a memorandum of understanding on evacuating civilians from each other’s countries during emergencies in third countries, he added.
The South Koreans hope for conciliatory comments from Kishida about Koreans forced to work for Japan during its occupation, but even without these the visit could help to keep “shuttle diplomacy” on track, he said.
Tokyo wants to broaden ties to reach a “more dynamic phase,” a Japanese foreign ministry official told a briefing, without elaborating.
Yoon’s moves have not always been popular at home, where many believe Japan has not done enough to atone for its occupation, which included forced labor and other abuses.
Japan says the issues were resolved by a treaty that normalized relations in 1965, but some South Korean governments and court rulings have disputed that.
