Justice Department drops classified documents case against Trump co-defendants

by Admin
Download app from appStore

The Justice Department on Wednesday moved to drop its appeal of a federal court order dismissing the criminal charges against President Donald Trump’s former co-defendants in the classified documents case, which would effectively end the case.

Then-U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland had cited the pending appeal as the reason why he would not publicly release special counsel Jack Smith’s report on the criminal case he’d brought against Trump, saying it could impact the due process rights of the co-defendants, Walt Nauta and Carlos De Oliveira.

The Justice Department’s motion to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to drop the appeal was filed by Hayden O’Byrne. O’Byrne was named interim U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida this week, the Miami Herald reported.

In a separate move Wednesday, the new acting U.S. Attorney in Washington, D.C., moved to dismiss a case against another Trump ally, former Republican Rep. Jeff Fortenberry of Nebraska.

O’Byrne’s filing asks the circuit court to dismiss the DOJ’s appeal “with prejudice,” which means it could not be revived again at a later date. His office was assigned the case after Smith resigned earlier this month.

The filing notes that Nauta and De Oliveira “do not object to the voluntary dismissal.” The appeals court needs to approve of the Justice Department’s move for its appeal to officially be dropped.

A spokesperson for the department declined to comment on what affect the move would have on the possibility of Smith’s report becoming public.

Trump and his attorneys had vehemently opposed the release of the report, as had attorneys for Nauta and De Oliveira.

Donald Trump and his aide Walt Nauta, right, in 2023.

U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump nominee, had dismissed the case against then-presidential candidate Trump, his aide Nauta and Mar-a-Lago employee De Oliveira last year.

The three had been charged with allegedly taking part in a scheme to help Trump retain highly classified documents that improperly remained in his possession after he left the White House in 2021 and with obstructing the ensuing federal investigation. All three had pleaded not guilty.

Cannon tossed the case in July after finding that Smith’s appointment as special counsel was illegal, which led to the current appeal. The Justice Department dropped its case against Trump after his election win, citing guidance from its Office of Legal Counsel that the executive branch agency cannot prosecute a sitting president — the person who heads the executive branch.

Carlos De Oliveira, Mar-a-Lago property manager, arrives at the courthouse (Eva Maire Uzcategui / AFP - Getty Images file)

Carlos De Oliveira, Mar-a-Lago property manager, arrives at the courthouse in Fort Pierce, Fla., in 2023.

That guidance also resulted in Smith dropping his other case against Trump, which had charged him with conspiracy against the United States for his efforts to stay in power after losing the 2020 presidential election.

Trump had no co-defendants in that case, and Smith’s report on the matter was released earlier this month. It contained mostly information from public court filings in the case.

Trump, Nauta and De Oliveira all sought to block the release of the second volume of the report, which centered on the classified documents case.

Garland agreed not to release that volume pending the resolution of the appeal, but still sought to share the report with congressional leaders, a move that Cannon blocked.

“Given the very strong public interest in this criminal proceeding and the absence of any enforceable limits on the proposed disclosure, there is certainly a reasonable likelihood that review by members of Congress as proposed will result in public dissemination of all or part of Volume II,” she wrote.

Cannon added that the report, which she had reviewed, contains “detailed and voluminous” information outlining the case against Trump, much of which “has not been made public in court filings.”

House Democrats on the Judiciary Committee had urged Garland to withdraw the appeal involving Nauta and De Oliveira before Trump took office so the attorney general could release the report.

They said their concerns that dismissing the case could enable further corruption “are outweighed by the many indications that Mr. Trump will simply end the prosecutions against his co-conspirators upon taking office anyway and then instruct his DOJ to permanently bury this report.”

The move to dismiss the case against Fortenberry was made by acting U.S. Attorney Ed Martin.

Fortenberry was a nine-term congressman when he was convicted in Los Angeles federal court in 2022 of lying to federal authorities about an illegal campaign contribution in 2016 from a Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire.

Trump had complained at a rally in Nebraska in 2022 that the case against Fortenberry was “very unfair,” according to the Nebraska Examiner.

The case was dismissed after an appeals court found the venue was improper and that Fortenberry should have been charged in Nebraska or Washington, D.C.

Prosecutors refiled the case in D.C. last year. Like O’Byrne’s motion, the filing by Martin asks that the case be dismissed with prejudice.

Trump celebrated the move in a social media post.

“It is great to see that the Department of Justice has dropped the Witch Hunt against former Congressman Jeff Fortenberry, a longtime proud and highly respected American public servant,” he wrote on Truth Social.

“The charges were totally baseless. That Scam is now over, so Jeff and his family can go back to having a great life together, and be a part of our Country’s future as we MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN. I am very proud of our Department of Justice, something I have not been able to say for many years!”

This article was originally published on NBCNews.com

Source Link

You may also like

Leave a Comment

This website uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you accept our use of cookies.